Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Evangeline Red et al v. Kraft Foods Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:10-cv-01028
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 29, 2015
'Greedy' Fee Bid Gets Low Payout For Kraft Label Attys
A California federal judge on Wednesday once again disappointed plaintiffs' attorneys in class action settlement of allegations Kraft Foods Inc. misleadingly labeled unhealthy snacks as "sensible," by awarding them only $11,000 out of a requested $1.9 million in fees for two years of work.
-
June 05, 2014
Judge Balks At 'Greedy' Atty Fee Bid In Kraft Labeling Suit
A California federal judge criticized the plaintiffs' attorneys' $1.8 million fee request in a class action settlement of allegations Kraft Foods Inc. misleadingly labeled unhealthy snacks as "sensible," saying Thursday the number appeared "greedy" considering the attorneys obtained mixed results.
-
September 11, 2012
Kraft Dodges Subclass, Cuts 'Sensible' Claims From Labels
Kraft Foods Inc. on Friday agreed to stop using certain wholesomeness claims on snack packages in order to avoid the prospect of facing certified subclasses of consumers who purchased cookie and cracker products in a suit in California federal court over allegedly misleading labels.
-
August 23, 2012
Consumers Win Class Cert In Kraft Packaging Suit
A California judge said Thursday that he plans to certify two subclasses of consumers who claim Kraft Foods Inc. mislabeled Vegetable Thin and Ritz crackers as "made with real vegetables," saying class members will be allowed to sue Kraft to block the products' packaging.
-
April 26, 2012
Kraft Cracker False Ad Class Denied Cert. In Round 2
A California federal judge Thursday refused for a second time to certify a class of consumers seeking damages for allegedly misleading labels on Kraft Foods Inc. products, saying calculating damages would be unmanageable, but allowed the plaintiffs to seek an injunction blocking the misleading labels.
-
September 29, 2011
Kraft Buyers Lose Class Bid In Cracker False Ad Suit
A California federal judge on Thursday refused to certify a nationwide class of consumers who allege Kraft Foods Inc. placed misleading labels on six of its cookie and cracker products that allegedly misrepresented the foods' wholesomeness.