Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
March 22, 2011
Kaneka Corporation v. Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd. et al
Case Number:
2:11-cv-02389
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Adli Law Group
- Arnold & Porter
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Carter Ledyard
- Fish & Richardson
- Glaser Weil
- Greenberg Traurig
- Keane & Beane
- K&L Gates
- Law Offices of Victor L. George
- Mayer Brown
- Mei & Mark
- Procopio Cory
- Raley & Bowick
- Rutan & Tucker
- Skiermont Derby
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
May 29, 2014
Kaneka's Suit After Adverse Claim Ruling Doesn't Merit Fees
A California federal judge has ruled that pursuing a patent case after an unfavorable claim construction ruling is not misconduct that merits an award of attorneys' fees under a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, denying a request for fees against supplement maker Kaneka Corp.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login