Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc et al
Case Number:
1:06-cv-00605
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Arnold & Porter
- Bryan Cave
- Faegre Drinker
- Fennemore
- Fish & Richardson
- Gibson Dunn
- Haug Partners
- Hellmich Law Group
- JVAM PLLC
- Leventhal Swan
- Perkins Coie
- Reichman Jorgensen
- Womble Bond
- Wood Herron
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 14, 2022
Crocs Touts $6M Win Against 2 Cos. In Footwear Patent Case
A Colorado federal court gave a more than $6 million judgment to footwear company Crocs Inc. in an infringement suit alleging two other companies sold look-alike products.
-
November 01, 2017
Dawgs Objects To Discovery Order In Crocs IP Fight
Footwear maker USA Dawgs Inc. on Tuesday objected to an order requiring it to produce additional financial statements in its severely trimmed suit accusing Crocs Inc. leadership of fraudulently obtaining patents, arguing that the information is no longer relevant given the narrowed scope of the case.
-
September 27, 2017
Judge Trims IP Suit Against Crocs, Spares Lanham Act Claim
A Colorado judge has dismissed all of U.S.A. Dawgs Inc.’s antitrust claims against Crocs Inc. leadership saying that Crocs’ successful defense of its contested patents undercut Dawgs' allegations that Crocs' suit was “sham litigation,” but kept the case alive by letting a Lanham Act false advertising claim stand.
-
April 19, 2017
Crocs Rival's Antitrust Row Gets Booted From IP Fight
A Colorado federal judge has nixed antitrust claims in footwear maker U.S.A. Dawgs Inc.'s suit alleging that rival Crocs Inc. fraudulently obtained patents and filed sham lawsuits to dominate the market for molded clogs, but he has kept alive allegations that Crocs' ads are misleading.