Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
June 08, 2012
FABEND v. L'OREAL USA, INC. et al
Case Number:
2:12-cv-03571
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Blank Rome
- Blecher Collins
- Bowman & Brooke
- Carella Byrne
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Edelman Combs
- Gardy & Notis
- Glancy Prongay
- Morelli Law Firm
- Podhurst Orseck
- Quantum Legal LLC
Companies
- J.C. Penney Co. Inc.
- Lord & Taylor LLC
- L'Oreal SA
- Macy's Inc.
- Nordstrom Inc.
- Saks Fifth Avenue LLC
- Sephora SA
- The Bon-Ton Stores Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 09, 2015
Retailers Fight Subpoenas In L'Oreal Wrinkle Cream MDL
Macy's Inc., Nordstrom Inc. and other retailers are fighting subpoenas requesting information on customers who purchased L'Oreal USA Inc. wrinkle cream products that were allegedly marketed deceptively and are the subject of multidistrict litigation in New Jersey, arguing that the request for information is too broad.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login