Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
August 14, 2012
MCANANEY et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
Case Number:
2:12-cv-05120
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
July 15, 2016
GSK, Indirect Purchasers Plan To Settle Pay-For-Delay Suit
The parties in a lawsuit challenging a pay-for-delay settlement between Teva Pharmaceuticals and GlaxoSmithKline over the latter’s epilepsy drug Lamictal are planning to settle the complaint, according to a letter filed Friday in New Jersey federal court.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login