Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Case Number:
1:13-cv-02018
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- ArentFox Schiff
- Burke Law Offices LLC
- Dentons
- Edelman Combs
- Kazerouni Law Group
- Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman
- Lieff Cabraser
- Locke Lord
- Matthew G. Miller PC
- Meyer Wilson
- Riley Safer
- Salvatore Prescott
- Sheppard Mullin
- Spragens Law
- Sudekum Cassidy
- Ulmer & Berne
Companies
- Farmers Insurance Group Inc.
- Geico Corp.
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 03, 2016
Consumers Seek Initial OK Of $7M State Farm TCPA Deal
A group of consumers asked an Illinois federal judge Tuesday for preliminary approval of a $7 million settlement resolving claims that State Farm violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by gathering leads through a third-party auto-dialing service.
-
April 21, 2016
State Farm's Liability Has No Impact On Class Cert., Court Told
Consumers suing State Farm for allegedly violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act stepped up their bid for class certification Wednesday, arguing a dispute over whether the insurer could be held liable for calls made by a third-party service doesn't undercut their certification bid.
-
April 07, 2016
State Farm Pushes Back Against Cert. Bid In Robocall Action
State Farm on Wednesday urged an Illinois federal judge to deny the class certification bid by a group of consumers who say the insurer violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by gathering leads through a third-party auto-dialing service, saying it can't be held liable for that company's actions.
-
March 02, 2016
Consumers Move For Cert. In State Farm Robocall Action
A group of consumers who say State Farm violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by gathering customer leads through a third-party auto-dialing service asked an Illinois federal judge on Tuesday to certify their proposed class action.
-
January 14, 2015
State Farm Still Can't Duck TCPA Class Claims
An Illinois federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a plaintiff from a proposed Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action alleging that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is vicariously liable for telemarketing calls made by a third party, saying that he hadn't alleged sufficient facts to back his claims.
-
September 26, 2014
State Farm Tries Again To Shake TCPA Class Action
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. once again asked an Illinois federal court Thursday to dismiss a Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action alleging it is vicariously liable for telemarketing calls made by a third party.
-
August 11, 2014
State Farm Can't Shake TCPA Action, But 2 Insurers Escape
An Illinois federal judge ruled on Monday that Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. and several Farmers Insurance Group units could not be held vicariously liable for allegedly unlawful telemarketing calls placed by a third party, but refused to toss identical class action claims brought against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.