- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
August 16, 2013
O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-03826
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Aiman-Smith & Marcy
- Browne George
- Crabtree & Auslander
- Geragos & Geragos
- Gibson Dunn
- Goldstein Borgen
- Kabateck Brown
- Knapp Petersen
- Lichten Liss-Riordan
- Littler Mendelson
- Morgan Lewis
- Napoli Shkolnik
- Quinn Emanuel
- SV Employment Law Firm
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 8, 2018
Uber Drivers Must Halt PAGA Claim Until 9th Circ. Weighs In
A California federal judge on Wednesday said a class of Uber drivers cannot amend its class action claim under the state’s Private Attorneys General Act until the Ninth Circuit rules on the ride-hailing company’s bids to dismantle the long-running suit that claims it misclassified the drivers as independent contractors.
Parties
To view the parties, register now.
Try Law360 FREE for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login