Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al
Case Number:
13-5248
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Government Agencies
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
- Financial Stability Oversight Council
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 24, 2015
DC Circ. Revives Texas Bank's CFPB Challenge
A U.S. appellate court on Friday revived a small Texas bank's challenge to the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, saying that because the bank offers products over which the bureau has authority it has standing to bring such a case.
-
November 19, 2014
DC Circ. Urged To Revive Challenges To Dodd-Frank, CFPB
A group of 11 states and several private plaintiffs urged the D.C. Circuit on Wednesday to revive their constitutional challenge to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act, including its orderly liquidation process, arguing they had suffered concrete injuries that gave them standing to sue.
-
May 13, 2014
States Assert Standing In DC Circ. Dodd-Frank Challenge
Eleven states urged the D.C. Circuit on Monday to overturn a lower court's dismissal of their constitutional challenge to key provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, saying they have standing to bring the suit because the legislation has already stripped them of their property rights under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.