AHW Investment Partnership v. Citigroup Inc.

  1. August 05, 2016

    2nd Circ. Says Citi Investors Can't Recoup $800M RMBS Loss

    The Second Circuit on Friday ruled that investment trusts controlled by insurance executive Arthur L. Williams and his wife, Angela, can't sue Citigroup Inc. for allegedly duping them into keeping shares that dropped during the financial crisis because their claimed $800 million loss is hypothetical.

  2. May 24, 2016

    Citi Shareholders Can Push $800M Suit Directly: Del. Court

    Delaware's high court ruled Tuesday that investment trusts controlled by insurance executive Arthur L. Williams and his wife Angela properly sued Citigroup Inc. directly, and did not have to proceed derivatively, on claims they lost $800 million when the bank duped them into holding shares that plunged during the financial crisis.

  3. April 27, 2016

    Del. High Court Prods Citi On $800M Shareholder Action

    Delaware's Supreme Court pressed a Citigroup Inc. attorney Wednesday to justify its view that only the company can sue for claims related to an investor's $800 million loss from fraudulent Citi guidance on subprime lending risks, in a closely watched effort to answer a federal appeals court inquiry.

  4. November 25, 2015

    2nd Circ. Asks Del. High Court's Opinion On $800M RMBS Suit

    The Second Circuit on Wednesday asked the Delaware Supreme Court for help in determining whether a group of investors can directly sue Citigroup Inc. over an alleged $800 million loss related to the bank's residential mortgage-backed securities, rather than in a derivative suit.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!