Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
March 21, 2013
Anti-Vibrational Rubber Parts - Dealership Actions
Case Number:
2:13-cv-00802
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Barrett Law Group
- Burns Charest
- Cozen O'Connor
- Crowell & Moring
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Freed Kanner
- Gibson Dunn
- Harken Law Firm
- Hertz Schram
- Juckniess Law Firm
- Kakinuki Law Office
- Katten Muchin
- Kerr Russell
- Kohn Swift
- Larson King
- Mantese Honigman
- Matthew G. Miller PC
- McAlpine PC
- Morgan Lewis
- Neal & Harwell
- Preti Flaherty
- Robins Kaplan
- Sidley Austin
- Spector Roseman
- Steven Williams Law
- Susman Godfrey
- Weil Gotshal
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
May 17, 2021
6th Circ. Says Auto Parts Buyers Can't Bring Price-Fixing Suit
The Sixth Circuit reversed a Michigan federal court decision that kept alive claims in a putative class action alleging price-fixing for rubber parts used to reduce engine and road vibration, ruling that classwide settlements with all end-payor purchasers in the broader multidistrict litigation bar this purported direct-purchaser case from going forward.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login