Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Stiles v. Walmart, Inc., et al.,
Case Number:
2:14-cv-02234
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alioto Law Firm
- Conkle Kremer
- Covington & Burling
- Dhillon Law Group
- Dinsmore & Shohl
- Goodwin Procter
- Jacobsen & McElroy
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
- Pierce Bainbridge
- Sheppard Mullin
- Towle Denison
- Veen Firm
- Vinson & Elkins
- White & Case
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 08, 2023
Wife's Walmart Stock Had No Impact On IP Case, Judge Says
A California federal magistrate judge has claimed he was not influenced in a patent case involving a disposable razor product by his wife's ownership of Walmart stock, according to a letter from the court's clerk.
-
March 20, 2023
Fed. Judge Cites Backlog 'Crisis' In Declining To Merge Suits
A California federal judge on Monday rejected a Walmart supplier's motion to consolidate two cases stemming from a patent dispute over a disposable razor invention and to delay the trial, citing the district's "overwhelming case load" that's forced him into a "substantial backlog of over 100 fully briefed, submitted motions."
-
November 10, 2022
Walmart Beats Patent, Antitrust Claims In Suit By Razor Maker
A California federal judge has handed a win to Walmart and a supplier in a suit accusing them of selling razors that were knockoffs of an inventor's patented product, saying the designs of the two products were not all that similar.