Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
August 24, 2015
Allergan, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-01455
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Amin Wasserman
- Arch & Lake LLP
- ArentFox Schiff
- Dacus Law Firm
- DTO Law
- Findlay Craft
- Fish & Richardson
- Foley & Lardner
- Gillam Smith
- Husch Blackwell
- Kellogg Hansen
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Naman Howell
- Nix Patterson
- Potter Minton
- Rakoczy Molino
- Shore Firm
- Sterne Kessler
- Sughrue Mion
- Taft Stettinius
- Venable LLP
- Ward Smith
- Wilson Robertson & VanDeventer
- Wilson Sonsini
- Winston & Strawn
- Yarbrough Wilcox
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
October 16, 2017
Judge Hacks Away At Allergan's Restasis Patents
A federal judge ruled Monday that claims in several patents covering Allergan PLC's dry-eye drug Restasis are invalid, dealing a blow to the drugmaker just weeks after it transferred the patents to a Native American tribe in an effort to shield them from review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login