Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
February 26, 2016
McCloskey et al v. Match Group Inc et al
Case Number:
3:16-cv-00549
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Bailey & Galyen
- Bragar Eagel
- Brian Lauten PC
- Bronstein Gewirtz
- Gainey McKenna
- Glancy Prongay
- Pomerantz LLP
- Sidley Austin
- Stinson LLP
- Wachtell Lipton
Companies
- Allen & Company LLC
- Bank of America Corp.
- Barclays PLC
- BMO Capital Markets Corp.
- BNP Paribas SA
- Deutsche Bank AG
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
August 27, 2018
SAT Prep Co.'s Stock-Drop Suit Dismissed With Prejudice
The Match Group, owner of the Princeton Review, won its bid to dismiss the third shot by a proposed shareholder class to bring claims it downplayed the impact of an SAT revamp before its initial public offering, with a Texas federal judge finding Friday the allegations failed to show the company made materially false statements.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login