Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

June 09, 2016

Todd Johnston v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

3:16-cv-03134

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Edward M. Chen

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. September 18, 2019

    Fate Of Uber Drivers' WARN Suit Up To Arbitrator: Judge

    A California federal judge ordered Uber and a former driver to let an arbitrator decide whether the driver qualifies as an employee protected under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, but left the possibility open that the law may override the ride-hailing giant's arbitration pacts.

4 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!