Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
November 7, 2016
Ramirez v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:16-cv-03111
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Abraham Fruchter
- Cantey Hanger
- Haynes and Boone
- Kendall Law Group
- Paul Weiss
- Robbins Geller
- Squire Patton Boggs
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 12, 2018
Exxon Says Investors' Climate Suit Can't Prove Execs' Mindset
Exxon Mobil Corp. has asked a Texas federal judge to rethink his decision to let investors proceed with a putative class action that accuses the oil giant of hiding its climate change knowledge, arguing the complaint lacked evidence of the executives’ mindsets when the allegedly misleading statements were made.
Parties
To view the parties, register now.
Try Law360 FREE for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login