- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
January 17, 2017
Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Case Number:
5:17-cv-00220
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Baker Botts
- Baker McKenzie
- Barrack Rodos & Bacine
- Berman Tabacco
- Bleichmar Fonti
- Boies Schiller
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Cotchett Pitre
- Cravath Swaine
- Eimer Stahl
- Gibson Dunn
- Hausfeld
- Irell & Manella
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Lieff Cabraser
- McDermott Will
- Morgan Lewis
- Munger Tolles
- Norton Rose Fulbright
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Redgrave LLP
- Scheper Kim
- Sheppard Mullin
- Shook Hardy
- Sidley Austin
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Susman Godfrey
- Wilkinson Walsh
- Williams & Connolly
- WilmerHale
Companies
- AT&T Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Foxconn
- Google Inc.
- Kyocera Corporation
- LG Electronics Inc.
- MediaTek Inc.
- NVIDIA Corporation
- Nokia Corporation
- QUALCOMM Incorporated
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- T-Mobile USA Inc.
- Wistron Corp.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
May 24, 2018
FTC Can't Get Access To Qualcomm's Internal Patent Ratings
The Federal Trade Commission won’t be able to get access to Qualcomm’s internal patent database because the ratings there are subject to attorney-client privilege, a California federal judge said, dealing a blow to the agency’s litigation over the chipmaker’s patent-licensing practices.
Parties
To view the parties, register now.
Try Law360 FREE for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login