May 15, 2017

Hale et al v. Pan Am Railways, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

1:17-cv-10855

Court:

Massachusetts

Nature of Suit:

P.I.: Other

Judge:

Nathaniel M. Gorton

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity


Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


Coverage

  1. August 05, 2020

    Pan Am Can't Peel Away Worker's Tater Tot Injury Suit

    Pan Am Railways must face a suit from a grocery-supply mover whose feet were crushed by a pallet of frozen Tater Tots, after a Massachusetts federal judge held Wednesday that there are enough disputed facts and that the railway failed to cite relevant cases to support its motion for summary judgment.

3 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS