Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Arrowood Indemnity Company
Case Number:
2:17-cv-01212
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 25, 2019
Costco Insurer Can't Recoup $8M Gender Bias Deal Payment
A Washington federal judge held Monday that Arrowood Indemnity Co. cannot recover a nearly $8 million payment it made toward Costco Wholesale Corp.'s settlement of a gender bias class action, but said more evidence is needed to determine whether the insurer must also pay the retail giant's costs in post-settlement arbitrations with class members.
-
November 09, 2018
Insurer Says Costco's $8M Gender Bias Deal Not Covered
Excess insurer Arrowood Indemnity Co. urged a Washington federal judge to hold that Costco's failure to secure its consent for an $8 million settlement of a gender bias class action relieves the insurer of any coverage duties, while Costco countered Arrowood waited too long to object to the deal.