Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
County of Marin v. Chevron Corp. et al
Case Number:
3:17-cv-04935
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Baker Botts
- Barg Coffin
- Bartlit Beck
- Carlson Calladine
- Conrad Metlitzky
- Cravath Swaine
- Crowell & Moring
- Duane Morris
- Eimer Stahl
- Gibson Dunn
- Goodwin Procter
- Greenberg Glusker
- Hogan Lovells
- Hunton Andrews
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Kellogg Hansen
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Latham & Watkins
- Manatt Phelps
- McGuireWoods
- Morgan Lewis
- Munger Tolles
- Nixon Peabody
- Paul Hastings
- Paul Weiss
- Reed Smith
- Sher Edling
- Shook Hardy
- SSL Law Firm
- Stern Kilcullen
- Susman Godfrey
- Tycko & Zavareei
- Venable LLP
- Vinson & Elkins
- White & Case
Companies
- Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
- APA Corp.
- Arch Resources Inc.
- BP PLC
- Chevron Corp.
- CITGO Petroleum Corp.
- ConocoPhillips Co.
- Devon Energy Corp.
- ENI SpA
- Hess Corp.
- Marathon Oil Corp.
- Marathon Petroleum Corp.
- Occidental Petroleum Corp.
- Peabody Energy Corp.
- Phillips 66
- Repsol SA
- Rio Tinto Group
- Shell PLC
- Statoil ASA
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 23, 2023
Calif. Climate Suits Against Energy Cos. Return To State Court
Following more than a five-year pause, related lawsuits from local California governments accusing energy companies of contributing to global warming are returning to state court after a district judge remanded them in 2018 but stayed the proceedings while the companies appealed the decision all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
April 10, 2018
Calif. Climate Torts' Remand On Hold Amid 9th Circ. Appeal
A California federal judge agreed on Monday with Exxon Mobil Corp. and other energy companies and put on hold an order sending climate change-related litigation brought by several local governments to state court, providing the Ninth Circuit with a chance to decide its jurisdiction.
-
March 27, 2018
Energy Cos. Urge Delay On Remand Of Calif. Climate Suits
Chevron Corp., Exxon Mobil Corp. and others on Monday urged a California federal judge to hold off on sending three municipalities' climate change tort suits back to state court, arguing that the court should wait for a Ninth Circuit decision that will settle questions concerning jurisdiction.
-
March 16, 2018
Calif. Climate Suits Sent Back To State Court In Fed Split
A California federal judge Friday sent back to state court climate change torts lodged by a trio of municipalities against dozens of oil, gas and coal companies, creating a split with another judge who's said similar suits filed by San Francisco and Oakland belong in federal court.
-
January 01, 2018
The Biggest Environmental Cases To Watch In 2018
Courts across the U.S. are poised to issue important rulings in environmental cases in the coming year, including a closely watched high court battle over where challenges to a rule defining the federal government’s jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act belong, and lawsuits seeking to reverse President Donald Trump’s moves to shrink national monuments. Here are the biggest environmental cases to watch in 2018.
-
November 27, 2017
Calif. Governments Appeal Peabody's Exit From Climate Suit
Two California counties and a city announced Sunday they'll appeal a bankruptcy court's decision to shield post-bankruptcy Peabody Energy from liability for driving long-term, possibly irreversible damage to the climate, as three dozen other fossil-fuel extractors continue to face the claims.