Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Ramnath et al v. Qudian Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-09741
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Cohen Milstein
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Glancy Prongay
- Kaplan Fox
- Levi & Korsinsky
- McCune Wright
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Pomerantz LLP
- Quinn Emanuel
- Robbins Geller
- Simpson Thacher
Companies
- China International Capital Corp. Ltd.
- Citigroup Inc.
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- Morgan Stanley
- Needham & Co. LLC
- Nomura Holdings Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 09, 2021
Attys For Qudian Investors Net Nearly $3M Fee
A team of mostly Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP attorneys will receive nearly $3 million for their work representing investors in a Chinese online microlender who alleged the company failed to mention a major auto loan project when it held its IPO, a federal judge in Manhattan decided.
-
November 16, 2020
Qudian, Investors Strike $8.5M IPO Suit Settlement Deal
Investors in Chinese online microlender Qudian on Friday asked a Manhattan federal judge to sign off on an $8.5 million settlement deal which, if approved, would end claims that the company left out mention of an expansive auto loan project from documents related to its 2017 initial public offering.
-
September 25, 2020
Qudian Investors Fight Bid To Nix Securities Suit Over IPO
A proposed class of investors in online microlender Qudian Inc. urged a New York federal judge Thursday to reject bids to dismiss a securities suit alleging the Chinese company hid its unfair debt collection practices, business plan and data vulnerabilities, causing its stock to tank after its initial public offering.