Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
December 12, 2017
Ramnath et al v. Qudian Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-09741
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Cohen Milstein
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Glancy Prongay
- Kaplan Fox
- Levi & Korsinsky
- McCune Wright
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Pomerantz LLP
- Quinn Emanuel
- Robbins Geller
Companies
- China International Capital Corp. Ltd.
- Citigroup Inc.
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- Morgan Stanley
- Needham & Co. LLC
- Nomura Holdings Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
June 09, 2021
Attys For Qudian Investors Net Nearly $3M Fee
A team of mostly Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP attorneys will receive nearly $3 million for their work representing investors in a Chinese online microlender who alleged the company failed to mention a major auto loan project when it held its IPO, a federal judge in Manhattan decided.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login