Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case Number:
1:18-cv-02830
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- A&O Shearman
- Barrack Rodos
- Berman Tabacco
- Bleichmar Fonti
- Cahill Gordon
- Calcaterra Pollack
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Covington & Burling
- Davis Polk
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Miller Shah LLP
- Paul Weiss
- Simpson Thacher
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- WilmerHale
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Zwerling Schachter
Companies
- Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
- Bank of America Corp.
- Barclays PLC
- Citigroup Inc.
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- Deutsche Bank AG
- Grupo Financiero Banamex S.A. de C.V.
- HSBC Holdings PLC
- ING Groep NV
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Metropolitan Transportation Authority
- Santander Holdings USA Inc.
- Santander Investment Securities Inc.
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
- United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 09, 2024
2nd Circ. Revives Investors' Mexican Bond-Rigging Claims
The Second Circuit on Friday reinstated U.S. investor claims accusing major banks of a yearslong collusion to rig Mexican government bond prices, saying a New York district court wrongly found it didn't have jurisdiction over the matter.
-
June 02, 2020
JPMorgan, Barclays To Pay Mexican Bond Investors $20.7M
JPMorgan Chase and Barclays PLC will pay a combined $20.7 million in what bondholders call "icebreaker" settlements of claims that the banks participated in a sweeping conspiracy to rig Mexican government bond prices, according to court filings.
-
April 22, 2020
Investors Fight Bid To Nix Mexican Bond Price-Fixing Suit
Investors urged a New York federal judge to keep alive claims that several big banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Barclays PLC, rigged Mexican government bond prices, arguing their amended complaint includes "smoking gun" evidence and that the court has jurisdiction over U.S.-based transactions.
-
October 01, 2019
Banks Get Mexican Bond Price-Fixing Suit Dismissed
A New York federal judge said Monday that a complaint accusing 10 major banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Barclays PLC and Deutsche Bank AG, of conspiring to fix the prices of Mexican government bonds is virtually free of allegations tying any one particular bank to the scheme.
-
September 18, 2018
Banks Want Out Of Mexican Bond Price-Fixing Case
A crop of major banks and affiliated entities have asked a New York federal court to toss a consolidated case alleging that they conspired to fix the prices of Mexican government bonds, saying the pension funds that brought the suit haven't adequately claimed that the financial institutions had a "conspiratorial agreement."
-
March 30, 2018
Major Banks Accused Of Mexican Bond Price-Fixing
A putative class of pension funds has filed an antitrust action against a crop of major banks including JPMorgan Chase, Barclays PLC and Deutsche Bank AG, alleging they conspired to fix the prices of Mexican government bonds that resulted in prices inflating 20 to 50 percent, according to a complaint filed Friday in New York federal court.