Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 04, 2018
Warner v. Starkist Co.
Case Number:
1:18-cv-00406
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 25, 2019
StarKist Faces Lighter Claims Over 'Heart-Healthy' Tuna
A New York federal judge Monday found that a StarKist Tuna customer can pursue his claim that the "Heart-Check Mark" on its products is an undisclosed paid endorsement, but went on to rule he had no grounds to try to stop future use of the mark.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login