Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 27, 2018
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:18-cv-02518
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Cotchett Pitre
- Eimer Stahl
- Freed Kanner
- Garwin Gerstein
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Gross & Belsky
- Hagens Berman
- Lite DePalma
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Paul Hastings
- Robins Kaplan
- Saveri & Saveri
- Simpson Thacher
- Spector Roseman
- Turke & Strauss
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
November 20, 2019
Chipmakers Urge Quick Dismissal Of Price-Fixing Suit
Samsung Electronics Co. and two other chipmakers have urged a California federal court to toss a proposed class action accusing them of fixing prices on dynamic random-access memory, saying the new complaint is just a repackaging of already-dismissed allegations.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login