Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
July 23, 2018
Paul et al v. Plank et al
Case Number:
1:18-cv-02239
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Brown Goldstein
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Fedder & Janofsky
- Fried Frank
- Goldman & Minton
- Hogan Lovells
- Johnson Fistel
- Labaton Keller
- Paul Weiss
- Venable LLP
- Zuckerman Spaeder
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 28, 2023
Under Armour Execs Escape Derivative Suit Called 'Not Ripe'
A Maryland federal judge has tossed a shareholder derivative suit claiming that executives of Under Armour Inc. artificially inflated the company's share price and cashed out hundreds of millions of dollars in stock options before the stock plummeted, ruling the suit's contribution claim is "not ripe."
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login