Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case Number:
2:18-mc-00798
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker McKenzie
- Berger & Lagnese
- Berger Montague
- Boni Zack
- Brown Goldstein
- Burns White
- DiCello Levitt
- Donahoo & Associates
- FeganScott
- Feinstein Doyle
- Fine Kaplan
- Freedman Boyd
- Girard Sharp
- Gordon Wolf & Carney
- Grabar Law
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hagens Berman
- Hartley LLP
- Hausfeld LLP
- Heins Mills
- Jones Day
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kessler Topaz
- K&L Gates
- Kramon & Graham
- Labaton Keller
- Lieff Cabraser
- Lockridge Grindal
- Lynch Carpenter
- McGowan Hood
- Minto Law Group
- Murphy Falcon
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Nye Stirling
- Obermayer Rebmann
- Robbins Geller
- Robert Peirce & Associates
- Robins Kaplan
- Rupp Pfalzgraf
- Shapiro Sher
- Specter Specter
- Steven Williams Law
- Zelle LLP
- Zuckerman Spaeder
Companies
- Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems
- Faiveley Transport SA
- Knorr-Bremse AG
- New York Air Brake Corp.
- Wabtec Corp.
- Xorail Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 30, 2018
Rail Equipment Cos. Want Workers' No-Poach Suits Tossed
Rail equipment suppliers Knorr-Bremse and Wabtec are urging a Pennsylvania federal judge to toss consolidated cases in multidistrict litigation over deals not to poach each other's workers, arguing that the proposed class hasn't sufficiently defined an antitrust market that has been harmed.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →