Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
January 09, 2020
Masimo Corporation et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
8:20-cv-00048
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Friedland Cianfrani
- Gibson Dunn
- Haynes Boone
- Knobbe Martens
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Morgan Lewis
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
December 22, 2025
Apple Seeks To Overturn $634M Masimo Patent Verdict
Apple has urged a California federal judge to grant its combined motion for judgment or a new trial for its $634 million trial loss over a Masimo patient monitor patent, arguing that no reasonable jury could have reached the verdict and that the tech giant was "severely prejudiced" by erroneous court rulings.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login