Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

April 07, 2020

Drieu v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:20-cv-02353

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Securities/Commodities

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

James Donato

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. November 05, 2025

    Robbins Geller's 'Eye-Watering' $28M Fee Bid Cut To $10.4M

    A California federal judge has rejected a $28 million attorney fee request from Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd as part of a $150 million investor settlement with Zoom, calling it an "eye-watering figure," and saying the firm can collect about $10.4 million instead.

8 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login