Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
October 19, 2020
Seagen Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.
Case Number:
2:20-cv-00337
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Covington & Burling
- Dacus Law Firm
- Gillam Smith
- Morrison Foerster
- MT2 Law Group
- Paul Hastings
- Ward Smith
- Williams & Connolly
- Willkie Farr
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
January 17, 2024
PTAB Nixes Seagen Cancer Drug IP After Daiichi Verdict
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has said Daiichi Sankyo was able to show that the challenged claims of a Seagen cancer drug patent, which a Texas federal jury found Daiichi infringed in a $42 million verdict in 2022, were invalid.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login