Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Casey Allan Muldoon et al v. Teamsters Local 572 et al
Case Number:
2:22-cv-00161
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 07, 2022
Ex-Teamsters Fight To Keep Challenge To Expulsion Alive
Four former union members urged a California federal judge to preserve their legal challenge to Teamsters Local 572's decision to expel them, saying the union hasn't presented a compelling argument for dismissing the case.
-
April 25, 2022
Teamsters Want Ex-Members' Exclusion Suit Tossed Again
Former members of a Teamsters local cannot sue over their positions being removed from a bargaining unit, the union has told a California federal judge, arguing that it acted in what it viewed as the best interest of its members.
-
March 14, 2022
Calif. Judge Tosses Suit Over Exclusion From Teamsters Unit
A Teamsters local did not violate its duty to represent its members when it excluded certain bakery workers from the bargaining unit in a labor contract, a California federal judge ruled, saying the union's action was a reasonable exercise of its judgment.
-
February 16, 2022
Suit Over Expulsion From Union Is Timely, Ex-Teamsters Say
Four former Teamsters urged a California federal judge not to dismiss their suit claiming the union unlawfully expelled them and owed them benefits, saying their fair representation claims are not time-barred.