Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
Case Number:
2:22-md-03034
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Bowman & Brooke
- Brooks Kushman
- Bush Seyferth
- Caldwell Cassady
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Dickinson Wright
- DLA Piper
- Fish & Richardson
- Hogan Lovells
- Honigman LLP
- Jenner & Block
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Office of Scott Woloson
- Miller Canfield
- Quinn Emanuel
- Scheef & Stone
- Sterne Kessler
- Varnum LLP
- Venable LLP
- Vorys
- Ward and Smith
- White & Case
Companies
- FCA US LLC
- Ford Motor Co.
- General Motors Co.
- Honda Motor Co. Ltd.
- Intel Corp.
- Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
- Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.
- Tesla Inc.
- Toyota Motor Corp.
- Volkswagen AG
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 04, 2025
Car Cos. Need Facts, Not Opinions, In Patent Suit, Judge Says
A Michigan federal judge on Tuesday pressed auto manufacturers for concrete proof that Neo Wireless investors withheld key information about a rival's project from patent officials, telling the carmakers they can't just fall back on an out-of-state judge's opinion to win the patent dispute.
-
July 22, 2024
Neo Wireless Deceived Patent Officials, Auto Giants Say
Automakers accused of infringing Neo Wireless LLC's technology have urged a Michigan federal judge to keep alive their defense that Neo committed misconduct, arguing that the wireless company withheld information about a competitor's project that would have rendered the patents at issue obvious.
-
July 08, 2024
The Biggest Patent Rulings Of 2024: A Midyear Report
The Federal Circuit issued its first en banc patent decision since 2018, a circuit judge's suspension was solidified and courts shed further light on foreign damages and skinny labels. Here's a look back at these rulings and other top patent decisions from the first half of 2024.
-
March 29, 2024
Vidal Offers 'Peace Of Mind' For MDL Rivals Heading To PTAB
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director Kathi Vidal has set new boundaries on interpreting the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's discretionary denial precedent for follow-on petitions, making clear that defendants can work together in multidistrict litigation without giving up the right to file separate patent challenges.
-
February 21, 2024
Auto Giants Can't Pause Neo Tech Patent MDL
A Michigan federal judge said Tuesday he wouldn't stay multidistrict litigation by Neo Wireless alleging multiple auto companies infringed its in-vehicle cellular technology while the automakers wait for reviews of the underlying patents, saying a pause now would just delay the cases' return to their original courts.
-
December 18, 2023
VW To Settle Part Of Cellular Tech Patent Fight With Neo
Volkswagen has agreed to settle infringement claims from Neo Wireless over a group of patents for in-vehicle cellular technology, but is still fighting the validity of some of the claims at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.