Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
June 23, 2022
NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
Case Number:
2:22-md-03034
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Bowman & Brooke
- Brooks Kushman
- Bush Seyferth
- Caldwell Cassady
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Dickinson Wright
- DLA Piper
- Fish & Richardson
- Hogan Lovells
- Honigman LLP
- Jenner & Block
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Office of Scott Woloson
- Miller Canfield
- Quinn Emanuel
- Scheef & Stone
- Sterne Kessler
- Varnum LLP
- Venable LLP
- Vorys
- White & Case
Companies
- FCA US LLC
- Ford Motor Co.
- General Motors Co.
- Honda Motor Co. Ltd.
- Intel Corp.
- Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
- Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.
- Tesla Inc.
- Toyota Motor Corp.
- Volkswagen AG
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 04, 2025
Car Cos. Need Facts, Not Opinions, In Patent Suit, Judge Says
A Michigan federal judge on Tuesday pressed auto manufacturers for concrete proof that Neo Wireless investors withheld key information about a rival's project from patent officials, telling the carmakers they can't just fall back on an out-of-state judge's opinion to win the patent dispute.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login