Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
Case Number:
6:22-cv-00372
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- ArentFox Schiff
- Athene Law
- Deutsch Hunt
- Groom Law Group
- Powers Pyles
- Sidley Austin
- Stafford Davis Firm
Companies
- American Association of Neurological Surgeons
- American Benefits Council
- American College of Emergency Physicians
- American College of Radiology Inc.
- American Hospital Association
- American Medical Association Inc.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists
- America's Health Insurance Plans Inc.
- Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers
- HR Policy Association
- National Retail Federation Inc.
- Texas Medical Association
- The ERISA Industry Committee
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
Government Agencies
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- U.S. Department of Labor
- U.S. Department of the Treasury
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 20, 2023
Employer Groups, Insurers Fight For 'No Surprises' Law
Employers and the health insurance industry are putting their legal weight behind the federal government's appeal of a Texas federal judge's decision that an arbitration system created for handling payment disputes with out-of-network providers unfairly favors insurers — warning that the only other choice is an unpredictable and expensive "free-for-all."
-
July 13, 2023
Gov't Takes 'No Surprises Act' Challenge To 5th Circ.
A group of federal agencies has urged the Fifth Circuit to reverse a Texas federal judge's decision rejecting provisions in an arbitration rule for a medical billing law known as the "No Surprises Act," arguing that the proposed rule falls squarely within Congress' directives.
-
February 06, 2023
'No Surprises' Medical Billing Rule Is Still Illegal, Judge Rules
A Texas federal judge granted wins Monday to plaintiffs in a consolidated lawsuit challenging a federal surprise medical billing rule relating to an arbitration system for handling payment fights between out-of-network providers and health insurers, finding the rule places "a thumb on the scale" in insurers' favor.
-
October 13, 2022
Health Orgs Push For Early Wins In Surprise Billing Challenge
The Texas Medical Association and an air ambulance company have both asked for wins in their lawsuit in Texas federal court challenging a federal surprise medical billing rule relating to an arbitration system for handling payment fights between out-of-network providers and health insurers.
-
October 05, 2022
Challenges To HHS Surprise Billing Rule Consolidated
A Texas federal judge has decided to combine two lawsuits challenging a surprise medical billing rule relating to an arbitration system for handling payment fights between out-of-network providers and health insurers.