Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
PERKINS COIE LLP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
Case Number:
1:25-cv-00716
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Eimer Stahl
- Herrera Arellano
- Kaiser PLLC
- Kalbian & Hagerty
- Kropf Moseley
- Munger Tolles
- Osborn Maledon
- Regan Zambri
- Sher Tremonte
- Susman Godfrey
- Wheeler Trigg
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Cato Institute
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Institute for Justice
- Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights
- NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund Inc.
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
- National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
- The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Government Agencies
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Executive Office of the President
- Federal Communications Commission
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- U.S. Department of Justice
- U.S. General Services Administration
- US Office of Management and Budget
- U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 11, 2025
Perkins Coie Slams Trump's Executive Order Retaliation
Perkins Coie LLP sued the Trump administration Tuesday over an executive order targeting the firm for its diversity-focused hiring efforts and its representation of certain political figures including former Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, calling the order "an affront to the Constitution" that aims to chill future representation of certain clients.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →