Motion | Filed: September 28, 2026
| Entered: September 28, 2026
Digital Land Wireless, Inc. et al v. Arch Telecom Inc. et al
Contract: Other | New York Eastern
Amend/Correct/Supplement
MOTION to Amend/Correct/Supplement 30 Amended Complaint, PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b) AND 60(b)(2) AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2) by Alpha Cellphone Plus, Inc., DB Wireless LLC, DNSY, Inc., Digital Land Wireless, Inc., Dreams of Field LLC, ESP Wireless Inc., Global T Management LLC, Kal Electronics Inc., Mainestream Wireless Inc., Making Foods, Inc., Mobile Media Passaic LLC, Noblesse & Co., Perfect Wireless Two LLC, Reemas Fashion, Inc., Texas Mobile Solutions LLC, Veyond Wireless, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declarations of Plaintiffs In Support of Their Motion for Relief from Dismissal and for Leave to Amend, # 2 Declaration DECLARATION OF JOHN HERMINA, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE DISMISSAL ORDER AND FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, # 3 Exhibit EXHIBIT A - Proposed Third Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit EXHIBIT B - Letter dated February 3, 2026 from Brian L. Bank, Esq, # 5 Exhibit EXHIBIT C - Letter dated April 7, 2026 from Brian L. Bank, Esq, # 6 Exhibit EXHIBIT D - Motion to Declassify in 170 East, # 7 Exhibit EXHIBIT E - Email dated December 13, 2023 from Atul Alex Ghai, President of Arch Telecom Inc., to Cody Welker of T-Mobile, # 8 Exhibit EXHIBIT F - Comparison of the Proposed Third Amended Complaint to the Second Amended Complaint Joint Local Civil Rule 15.1(a); Individual Rule IE, # 9 Exhibit EXHIBIT G - Affirmation of John Hermina dated September 7, 2026, in Opposition to The Portables Choice Group ULCs Order to Show Cause Sunshine Wireless of Long Island Inc., et al. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.) (Hermina, John)
Order | Filed: September 24, 2026
| Entered: September 24, 2026
Digital Land Wireless, Inc. et al v. Arch Telecom Inc. et al
Contract: Other | New York Eastern
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply
ORDER: The 97 Request for Enlargement of Page Limits and Extension of Reply deadline is granted. Plaintiffs' opening brief and each Defendant's opposition brief is not to exceed thirty-five pages. If either Defendant's opposition brief exceeds twenty-five pages, Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a reply brief which is not to exceed fifteen pages.
The deadlines for Plaintiffs to file their reply is extended to November 16, 2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo on 9/24/2026. (BTW)