Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Bdo Usa Llp x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Contract: Other | New York Southern
Order
ORDER granting 93 Letter Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference. On July 23, 2026, Defendant filed a letter motion for a Local Rule 37.2 Conference regarding its motion to quash a non-party subpoena. Dkt. 93; see also Dkt. 97. The next day, Plain tiff filed a letter motion to compel Defendant to produce certain documents. Dkt. 94; see also Dkt. 99. Accordingly, the Court will hold a virtual conference to discuss both motions on August 6, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. via Teams video conference. Couns el shall submit an appearance sheet pursuant to the Court's Individual Rule 2.B and will receive Microsoft Teams log-in credentials at the email addresses provided. The public listen-only line may be accessed by dialing Phone Number: 646 453-4442 | Phone Conference ID: 223 027 99#. SO ORDERED. Status Conference set for 8/6/2026 at 10:00 AM before Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 7/29/2026) (jca)
MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying without prejudice to renewal 98 Letter Motion to Seal. ENDORSEMENT: Request DENIED with leave to renew motion. "Judicial documents are subject at common law to a potent and fundamental presumptive right of public ac cess[.]" Olson v. Major League Baseball, 29 F.4th 59, 87 (2d Cir. 2022) (citation omitted). "The burden is on the party seeking to file the document under seal to show as to each document the specific harm or prejudice that will occur if sealing is not authorized." BAT LLC v. TD Bank, N.A., No. 15-cv-05839 (RRM) (CLP), 2019 WL 13236131, at *8 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 24, 2019). [T]he mere fact that a document was marked confidential during discovery does not establish that sealing is r equired. Cypress Holdings, III, L.P. v. Sport-BLX, Inc., No. 22-cv-08111 (LGS), 2025 WL 2408919, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2025). Further, "sealing should be 'narrowly tailored,' and redacting sensitive information is a preferable alt ernative to sealing an entire document." SEC v. Telegram Grp. Inc., No. 19-cv-09439 (PKC), 2020 WL 3264264, at *1(S.D.N.Y. June 17, 2020) (citation omitted). Plaintiff files this motion on Defendants behalf, and articulates no basis for theseali ng request beyond the fact that the documents "are confidential." That is not enough. Nevertheless, the Court will consider a renewed motion in line with the above standards. This order terminates the motion at Dkt. 98. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 7/29/2026) (jca)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.