Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Crum & Forster Holdings Corp.
-
Motion | Filed: April 25, 2024 | Entered: April 25, 2024 In re California Bail Bond Antitrust Litigation
Other Statutory Actions | California Northern
Settlement
MOTION for Settlement Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements with Defendants Lexon Insurance Company and Danielson National Insurance Company filed by Shonetta Crain, Kira Serna. Motion for Settlement Hearing set for 7/18/2024 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. Responses due by 5/9/2024. Replies due by 5/16/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Dean M. Harvey in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval, # 2 Exhibit 1 - Lexon Settlement Agreement, # 3 Exhibit 2 - DNIC Settlement Agreement, # 4 Exhibit 3 - Lieff Cabraser Resume, # 5 Exhibit 4 - Airlines Final Approval Order, # 6 Declaration of Hugh McCreery in Support of Proposed Settlement, # 7 Declaration of Eric Schachter in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval, # 8 Proposed Order)(Harvey, Dean) (Filed on 4/25/2024)
-
Motion | Filed: April 25, 2024 | Entered: April 25, 2024 Big Dog Construction Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, subscribing to Policy Number COC-20063 et al
Insurance | Florida Southern
Dismiss
First MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice 1 Complaint,,, by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, subscribing to Policy Number COC-20063, Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, Palomar Excess and Surplus Insurance Company, Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance, TRISURA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Tokio Marine Highland. Responses due by 5/9/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A-G)(Jones, Kimberly)
-
Order | Filed: April 25, 2024 | Entered: April 25, 2024 In Re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
P.I.: Other | New York Southern
Order on Motion to Add Party(ies)
ORDER granting (9696) Motion to Add in case 1:03-md-01570-GBD-SN; granting (2045) Motion to Add in case 1:02-cv-06977-GBD-SN. The Ashton Plaintiffs' claims are not futile, will not unduly delay these proceedings or prejudice the Taliban, and were not filed in bad faith or with a dilatory motive. Their motion is therefore GRANTED, and it is further ORDERED that: The Ashton Plaintiffs' Sixth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 1463,is amended to include the individuals identified in the exhibit at ECF No. 9699-1 as parties in the action against the Taliban; These amendments supplement, but do not displace, the Ashton Plaintiffs' Sixth Amended Complaint, ECF No. 1463; Prior rulings, orders, and judgments entered in this case remain in effect as to all parties; and Further service on the Taliban is not required as a result of these amendments, and prior service orders apply, including the Court's orders on service by publication at ECF No. 445. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 9696 and the related motion at ECF No. 2045 in Ashton, No. 02-cv-06977.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 4/25/2024) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:03-md-01570-GBD-SN, 1:02-cv-06977-GBD-SN (ate)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login