Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in First County Bank x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Other | Connecticut
Order
ORDER. For the reasons below, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 16 is dismissed. On May 12, 2026, the court dismissed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with leave to amend on or before June 11, 2026 for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 13. On June 10, 2026, Plaintiff requested additional time to file his Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), which the court granted on June 11. On July 14, 2026, Plaintiff filed his SAC."Pro se submissions are reviewed with special solicitude, and 'must be construed liberally and interpreted to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest.'" Matheson v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 706 F. App'x 24, 26 (2d Cir. 2017) (quoting Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474-75 (2d Cir. 2006) (per curiam)).After review, even construing the pro se SAC liberally, the Court cannot discern the facts or causes of action underlying Plaintiff's SAC 16 . A district court may dismiss a case filed in forma pauperis if it determines that "the action or appeal... is frivolous or malicious; [or] fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Here, the SAC fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's SAC, which names dozens of unrelated defendants including individuals, institutions, and government bodies, is a series of difficult-to-follow statements that appear to relate to a wide range of events in the Plaintiff's life. These include court cases, workplace grievances, interactions with the police, accounts with financial institutions, a change in the date of his dental appointment by "Premier Oral Surgery of Connecticut," and various other incidents. The court cannot discern any connection between these events, intuit any cause of action therein, or see how the requested relief relates to those causes of action.Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 16 is therefore dismissed sua sponte without leave to amend. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Sarah F. Russell on 7/15/2026.(dl)
Amended Complaint
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Antignani and Maresca, Communication Workers of America, Frontier Communications, Judicial Professional Employees Union, Robert A. Maresca, Paulette Smith, State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition, State of Connecticut, filed by Derrick Troy Shipp.(ll)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.