Case Activity (9994)

1. Filed: July 30, 2026 | Entered: July 30, 2026 GrubHub Holdings Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al

   410 Anti-Trust | Illinois Northern

   Minute

   MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Video status and motion hearing held on Plaintiff GrubHub's motion to file additional counsel appearance, R 277. Counsel for the parties appeared by video. (1.) Because of the need to inquire into the attorney-client relationship, the Court held an ex parte and under seal hearing with Plaintiff GrubHub's counsel from the Vorys law firm and the proposed incoming counsel from Jenner & Block. The Court will post an under-seal, ex parte entry summarizing that discussion. On the public record, the Court found that the meet-and-confer requirement had been violated at the fault of Jenner & Block and Plaintiff GrubHub. (2.) As discussed during the ex parte and under seal hearing, the motion to file additional counsel appearances 227 is granted provisionally. If the defense wishes to challenge the newly retained counsel's appearance, then the Defendants shall confer with the Plaintiffs and then file the appropriate motion as soon as practicable. The Court will post an ex parte and under seal entry summarizing the ex parte session. (3.) The filing at R. 226 is a duplicate filing of R. 227. What was intended as Attorney Litvack's motion to appear pro hac vice 226 is terminated as moot, because counsel is already a member of the District Court's General Bar. (4.) As further stated on the record, during the trial, the Plaintiffs will only be allowed one attorney examiner per witness, rather than multiple as generally allowed in Judge Chang's standing Case Management Procedures (under Experience for Newer Attorneys). The GrubHub trial-team relationship has become dysfunctional and the miscommunications (and outright instruction to file a motion without having met-and-conferred) must cease. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 07/30/2026)

2. Order | Filed: July 30, 2026 | Entered: July 30, 2026 Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.

   Labor: Other | California Northern

   Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Order on Motion for Settlement

   ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting in part and denying in part 453 Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Service Awards; granting 459 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2026)

3. 9992 additional result(s)