Law360 - The Newswire for Business Lawyers

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Law360 Law360
  Sign In

Law360

|

The Practice of Law

Access to Justice Aerospace & Defense Appellate Asset Management Banking Bankruptcy Benefits California Cannabis Capital Markets Class Action Colorado Commercial Contracts Competition Compliance Connecticut Construction Consumer Protection Corporate Criminal Practice Cybersecurity & Privacy Delaware Employment
Energy Environmental Fintech Florida Food & Beverage Georgia Government Contracts Health Hospitality Illinois Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Legal Ethics Legal Industry Life Sciences Massachusetts Media & Entertainment Mergers & Acquisitions Michigan Native American
New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice Private Equity Product Liability Project Finance Public Policy Real Estate Retail & E-Commerce Securities Sports & Betting Tax Technology Telecommunications Texas Transportation Trials Washington White Collar

Law360 Pulse

|

Business of Law

California Pulse Connecticut Pulse Courts DC Pulse Daily Litigation Delaware Pulse
Florida Pulse Georgia Pulse In-House Insights Legal Tech & AI Mid-Law
Modern Lawyer New Jersey Pulse New York Pulse Pennsylvania Pulse Small Law Texas Pulse

Law360 Authority

|

Deep News & Analysis

Tax Authority

Federal International State & Local

Employment Authority

Discrimination Labor Other Wage & Hour

Insurance Authority

General Liability Other Property Specialty Lines

Real Estate Authority

Commercial Other Residential

Bankruptcy Authority

Large Cap Mid Cap

Healthcare Authority

Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & Compliance

Law360 Global Products

Law360 UK

Commercial Litigation UK Corporate Crime & Compliance UK Employment UK
Financial Services UK Insurance UK Intellectual Property UK
Pulse UK Transactions UK

Law360 Australia

Commercial Disputes AU Financial Services AU

Close
  • Law360
  • Law360 UK
  • Law360 Pulse
  • Law360 Employment Authority
  • Law360 Tax Authority
  • Law360 Insurance Authority
  • Law360 Real Estate Authority
  • Law360 Healthcare Authority
  • Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
  • Products
  • Lexis®
  • Law360 Tax Authority
  • Law360 In-Depth
  • Law360 Podcasts
  • Rankings
  • Leaderboard Analytics
  • Regional Powerhouses
  • Law360's MVPs
  • Women in Law Report
  • Law360 400
  • Diversity Snapshot
  • Practice Groups of the Year
  • Rising Stars
  • Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
  • Sections
  • Adv. Search & Platform Tools
  • About all sections
  • Browse all sections
  • Banking
  • Bankruptcy
  • Class Action
  • Competition
  • Employment
  • Energy
  • Expert Analysis
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Product Liability
  • Securities
  • Beta Tools
  • Track docs
  • Track attorneys
  • Track judges
  • Site Menu
  • Join the Law360 team
  • Search legal jobs
  • Learn more about Law360
  • Read testimonials
  • Contact Law360
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • Law360 Company
  • About Law360 Authority
  • Resource Library
  • Site Map
  • Help

US Coverage

Law360 | The Practice of Law

Access to Justice
Aerospace & Defense
Appellate
Asset Management
Banking
Bankruptcy
Benefits
Cannabis
Capital Markets
Class Action
Commercial Contracts
Competition
Compliance
Construction
Consumer Protection
Corporate
Criminal Practice
Cybersecurity & Privacy
Employment
Energy
Environmental
Fintech
Food & Beverage
Government Contracts
Health
Hospitality
Immigration
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Trade
Legal Ethics
Life Sciences
Media & Entertainment
Mergers & Acquisitions
Native American
Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice
Private Equity
Product Liability
Project Finance
Public Policy
Real Estate
Retail & E-Commerce
Securities
Sports & Betting
Tax
Technology
Telecommunications
Transportation
Trials
White Collar

State Specific Coverage

California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Massachusetts
Michigan
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Texas
Washington

Law360 Authority | Deep News & Analysis

Employment Authority

Discrimination
Labor
Other
Wage & Hour

Tax Authority

Federal
International
State & Local

Insurance Authority

General Liability
Other
Property
Specialty Lines

Real Estate Authority

Commercial
Other
Residential

Healthcare Authority

Deals & Corporate Governance
Digital Health & Technology
Other
Policy & Compliance

Bankruptcy Authority

Large Cap
Mid Cap

Global Coverage

Law360 UK

Commercial Litigation UK
Corporate Crime & Compliance UK
Employment UK
Financial Services UK
Insurance UK
Intellectual Property UK
Pulse UK
Transactions UK

Law360 Canada

ADR
Access to Justice
Banking, Bankruptcy & Insolvency
Business
Civil Litigation
Constitutional
Criminal
Family
Immigration
In-House Counsel
Information Technology
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labour & Employment
Natural Resources
Other Areas of Practice
Personal Injury
Pulse
Real Estate
Tax
The Complete Brief
Wills, Trusts & Estates

Law360 Pulse | The Business of Law

California Pulse
Connecticut Pulse
Courts
DC Pulse
Daily Litigation
Delaware Pulse
Florida Pulse
Georgia Pulse
In-House
Insights
Legal Tech & AI
Mid-Law
Modern Lawyer
New Jersey Pulse
New York Pulse
Pennsylvania Pulse
Small Law
Texas Pulse

Mealeys

Mealey's Artificial Intelligence
Mealey's Asbestos
Mealey's Asbestos Bankruptcy
Mealey's Attorney Fees
Mealey's California Insurance
Mealey's California Section 17200
Mealey's Catastrophic Loss
Mealey's Class Actions
Mealey's Construction Defects Insurance
Mealey's Copyright
Mealey's Coronavirus
Mealey's Cyber Tech & E-Commerce
Mealey's Data Privacy
Mealey's Daubert
Mealey's Disability Insurance
Mealey's Discovery
Mealey's Drugs & Devices
Mealey's ERISA
Mealey's Emerging Insurance Disputes
Mealey's Employment
Mealey's Fracking
Mealey's Insurance
Mealey's Insurance Bad Faith
Mealey's Insurance Fraud
Mealey's Insurance Insolvency
Mealey's Insurance Pleadings
Mealey's Intellectual Property
Mealey's International Arbitration
Mealey's Patents
Mealey's Personal Injury
Mealey's Pollution Liability
Mealey's Reinsurance
Mealey's Securities
Mealey's Texas Insurance
Mealey's Tobacco
Mealey's Toxic Torts
Mealey's Trademarks

MLex

Antitrust
Artificial Intelligence
Data Privacy and Security
DealRisk®
Energy
Financial Crime
Financial Services
Intellectual Property
Mergers and Acquisitions
State Aid
Technology
Trade
Intellectual Property Securities Bankruptcy Competition Pulse Artificial Intelligence Law360 UK || See all sections ||

Searching dockets in New York Yankees

 

Please assign a name to this alert

All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes

Case Activity (3334)

  1. Order | Filed: August 25, 2026 Piney et al v. City Of New York et al

    Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern

    Order

    ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT On July 23, 2026, Plaintiff Devon Dawkins ("Dawkins"), on behalf of himself and the proposed Class (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), filed a motion for preliminary approval of Plaintiffs' Settlement with Defendant Best Buy Co. Inc. ("Best Buy" or "Defendant") (together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"). In doing so, Plaintiffs requested certificati on of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 ("Rule 23") class action and final certification of the FLSA collective action, for settlement purposes only, and sought approval of a settlement on behalf of these putative class members (& quot;Class Members"). The Court has considered Plaintiffs' request for approval of a Rule 23 class pursuant to Rule 23(e) and collective certification for settlement purposes only, and the Best Buy Settlement Agreement and Release ( "Best Buy Agreement"), filed in its final form on July 23, 2026, and the Declaration of Innessa M. Huot ("Huot Decl."), and hereby finds and orders as follows: I. Preliminary Approval of Settlement 1. Unless otherw ise defined herein, all terms used in this Order (the "Preliminary Approval Order") will have the same meaning as defined in the Best Buy Agreement, filed on July 23, 2026. 2. The Court finds on a preliminary basis that the settlement m emorialized in the Best Buy Agreement falls within the range of reasonableness and, therefore, meets the requirements for preliminary approval such that notice to the Class is appropriate. 3. The Court finds that the Best Buy Agreement is the r esult of extensive, arm's length negotiations by counsel well versed in the prosecution of wage and hour class actions. 4. The Court grants Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of the Best Buy Agreement, Certification of the Be st Buy Settlement Class, Appointment of Class Counsel, and Approval of Plaintiffs' Notice of Settlement and Claim Form. II. Certification of the Proposed Class and Collective for Settlement Purposes Only 5. Preliminary approval of the Se ttlement, class and collective certification for settlement purposes, and appointment of class counsel have several practical purposes, including avoiding the costs of litigating class status while facilitating a global settlement, ensuring all c lass members are notified of the terms of the proposed Best Buy Agreement, and setting the date and time of the final approval hearing. 6. Pursuant to Rule 23(e), the Court certifies, for settlement purposes only, a Rule 23 class consisting of al l current and former NYPD Officers, Detectives, Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains, and Inspectors who performed work at Best Buy Locations in New York State, through the Paid Detail Program (the "PDP"), at any time from January 23, 201 9 through May 4, 2025. 7. For settlement purposes only, the Court also grants final certification of the FLSA collective action consisting of all current and former NYPD Officers, Detectives, Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains, and Inspectors wh o performed work at Best Buy Locations in New York State, through the PDP, at any time from January 23, 2022 through May 4, 2025. As further set forth in this Order, The Court will conduct a Fairness Hearing pursuant to Rule 23(e)(2) on February 9, 2027 at 10:00 a.m. ET in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 for the purposes of: (a) hearing any timely and properly filed objections; (b) making a final determination as to the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of the Best Buy Agreement terms and procedures; (c) fixing the amount of attorneys' fees and litigation costs and expenses to Class Counsel and the service payment to Plaintiff Faysal; and (d) entering Judgment, if appropriate. The Fairness Hearing may be c ontinued without further notice to the Class Members. Plaintiffs shall file their motion for final approval of the Best Buy Settlement, and Class Counsel shall file their motion for attorneys' fees and litigation costs and expenses, and service payment within 150 days of this Order. 21. The following dates shall govern the schedule in this action: September 24, 2026 Mailing of Settlement Notices and Claim Forms. November 23, 2026 Last day for Class Members to qualify as Authorized Claimants by filing Claim Forms to join the Settlement. Also, the last day for Class Members to submit written objections to the Settlement. December 8, 2026 Last day for Class Members who did not timely receive the Settlement Notice or were unable to file th e Claim Form within 60 days due to extraordinary circumstances to qualify as Authorized Claimants by filing Claim Forms to join the Settlement. January 22, 2027 Filing of all papers in support of final settlement approval with the Court. February 9, 2027 at 10:00 a.m. ET in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 Fairness Hearing. IT IS S... (truncated)

  2. Order | Filed: August 25, 2026 Piney et al v. City Of New York et al

    Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern

    Order

    ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT On July 23, 2026, Plaintiffs Devon Dawkins ("Dawkins") and Alexis Yanez ("Yanez") on behalf of themselves and the proposed Class (collectively, &qu ot;Plaintiffs"), filed a motion for preliminary approval of Plaintiffs' Settlement with Defendant Color Image Apparel, Inc. d/b/a Alo Yoga ("Alo Yoga or "Defendant") (together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"). In d oing so, Plaintiffs requested certification of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 ("Rule 23") class action and final certification of the FLSA collective action, for settlement purposes only, and sought approval of a settlement on behal f of these putative class members ("Class Members"). The Court has considered Plaintiffs' request for approval of a Rule 23 class pursuant to Rule 23(e) and collective certification for settlement purposes only, and the Alo Yoga Sett lement Agreement and Release ("Alo Yoga Agreement), filed in its final form on July 23, 2026, and the Declaration of Innessa M.Huot ("Huot Decl."), and hereby finds and orders as follows: I. Preliminary Approval of Settlement 1. Unless otherwise defined herein, all terms used in this Order (the "Preliminary Approval Order") will have the same meaning as defined in the Alo Yoga Agreement, filed on July 23, 2026. 2. The Court finds on a preliminary basis that the se ttlement memorialized in the Alo Yoga Agreement falls within the range of reasonableness and, therefore, meets the requirements for preliminary approval such that notice to the Class is appropriate. 3. The Court finds that the Alo Yoga Agreement is the result of extensive, arm's length negotiations by counsel well versed in the prosecution of wage and hour class actions. 4. The Court grants Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of the Alo Yoga Agreement, Certification of the Alo Yoga Settlement Class, Appointment of Class Counsel, and Approval of Plaintiffs' Notice of Settlement and Claim Form. II. Certification of the Proposed Class and Collective for Settlement Purposes Only 5. Preliminary approval of the Settle ment, class and collective certification for settlement purposes, and appointment of class counsel have several practical purposes, including avoiding the costs of litigating class status while facilitating a global settlement, ensuring all class m embers are notified of the terms of the proposed Alo Yoga Agreement, and setting the date and time of the final approval hearing. 6. Pursuant to Rule 23(e), the Court certifies, for settlement purposes only, a Rule 23class consisting of all curren t and former NYPD Officers, Detectives, Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains, and Inspectors performed worked for Alo Yoga in New York State, through the Paid Detail Program (the "PDP"), at any time from January 23, 2019 through April 17, 202 6. 7. For settlement purposes only, the Court also grants final certification of the FLSA collective action consisting of all current and former NYPD Officers, Detectives, Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains, and Inspectors who performed worked for A lo Yoga in New York State, through the PDP, at any time from January 23, 2022 through April 17, 2026. As further set forth in this Order, The Court will conduct a Fairness Hearing pursuant to Rule 23(e)(2) on February 9, 2027 at 10:00 a.m. ET in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 for the purposes of: (a) hearing any timely and properly filed objections; (b) making a final determination as to the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of the Alo Yoga Agreement terms and pr ocedures; (c) fixing the amount of attorneys' fees and litigation costs and expenses to Class Counsel and the service payments to Plaintiffs Dawkins and Yanez; and (d) entering Judgment, if appropriate. The Fairness Hearing may be continued wi thout further notice to the Class Members. Plaintiffs shall file their motion for final approval of the Alo Yoga Settlement, and Class Counsel shall file their motion for attorneys' fees and litigation costs and expenses, and service payment within 150 days of this Order. 21. The following dates shall govern the schedule in this action: September 24, 2026 Mailing of Settlement Notices and Claim Forms. November 23, 2026 Last day for Class Members to qualify as Authorized Claimants by fi ling Claim Forms to join the Settlement. Also, the last day for Class Members to submit written objections to the Settlement. December 8, 2026 Last day for Class Members who did not timely receive the Settlement Notice or were unable to file the Cl aim Form within 60 days due to extraordinary circumstances to qualify as Authorized Claimants by filing Claim Forms to join the Settlement. January 22, 2027 Filing of all papers in support of final settlement approval with the Court. February 9, 2027 at 10:00 a.m. ET in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 Fairness Hearing. IT IS SO... (truncated)

  3. 3332 additional result(s)

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Archive of over 450,000 articles
  • Database of over 2.1 million cases
  • Full-text search of patent complaints
  • Full-text search of PTAB cases and documents
  • Database of TTAB cases and documents, including full-text search of documents
  • Customized email alerts and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View full search results

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access? Click here to login

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Register Now!

Sign up now for free access to this content

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.

You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.

We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Register

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In
RELX Group Lexis Nexis

© 2026, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Careers at Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Trust Center | Cookie Settings | Processing Notice | Ad Choices | Help | Site Map | Resource Library | Law360 Company | Testimonials