Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Plains Gp Holdings Lp x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Environmental Matters | California Central
For Order Enforce
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY THE CONSENT DECREE IN US V. PLAINS 49 , GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO ENFORCE THE CONSENT DECREE 55 , AND ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS IN RELATED PIPELINE ACTIONS: (1) DENYING A MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IN CALIFORNIA V. WRIGHT 16 , (2) DENYING A MOTION TO DISMISS IN SABLE V. QUINTERO 27 , AND (3) GRANTING A MOTION TO REMAND IN BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY V. CALIFORNIA 46 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. For the foregoing reasons, and in the manner described, supra: the motion to modify the consent decree in US v. Plains is GRANTED; the motion to enforce the Consent Decree in US v. Plains is GRANTED IN PART; the motion for preliminary injunction in Wright is DENIED; the motion to dismiss in Quintero is DENIED. Judgment in Quintero is DECLARED, and the case is closed; and the motion for remand in Biodiversity is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court hereby: (1) MODIFIES the Consent Decree in US v. Plains to terminate the ongoing requirements for Plains, substitute PHMSA for OSFM, and incorporate by reference the requirements of the State Waivers, including the substance of some California state law; (2) ENFORCES the Consent Decree by imposing on Sable a penalty of $1.449 million; (3) DECLARES that the Defense Production Act, through Secretary Wright's allocation order, bars California's Department of Parks and Recreation from bringing legal action to prevent Sable from complying with the DPA Order by operating the Onshore Pipeline; and (4) REMANDS Biodiversity to Santa Barbara Superior Court. (See document for further details).; granting 49 MOTION for Order for Termination or Modification of the Consent Decree; granting in part 55 MOTION to Enforce CONSENT DECREE. (aco)
Response
RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff United States of Americato Notice of Entry of Decision or Ruling by a Judge of this Court 83 (Bachman, Stefan)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.