Case Activity (2362)

1. Order | Filed: July 20, 2026 | Entered: July 21, 2026 W.P. v. MindGeek S.a.r.l. et al

   Other Statutory Actions | California Central

   Dismiss Case

   MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOVING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 110 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is GRANTED in its entirety without prejudice. To the extent that Plaintiffs wish to attempt to address the identified deficiencies in a second amended complaint, they must do so within 21 days of this Order. (lom)

2. Order | Filed: July 20, 2026 | Entered: July 21, 2026 Serena Fleites et al v. MindGeek S.A.R.L. et al

   Other Statutory Actions | California Central

   Dismiss Case

   ORDER GRANTING CB DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 635 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion as follows: (Count II) beneficiary liability under the TVPRA in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 1595; (Count III) conspiracy to violate the TVPRA pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1594(c), 1595; (Count X) violation of the UCL under the Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200; and (Count XII) violation of civil conspiracy are all dismissed with prejudice. The Court dismisses these four claims with prejudice as this is Plaintiff Fleites' third iteration of her complaint, and it appears that the relevant defects, which this Court specifically identified in the Colbeck Order but are not cured by the TAC, "could not possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts. Cook, Perkiss & Liehe, Inc. v. N. Cal. Collection Serv. Inc., 911 F.2d 242, 247 (9th Cir. 1990) (affirming dismissal of appeal where amendment could not cure defect in pleadings). (lom)

3. 2360 additional result(s)