Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Shin-Etsu Chemical
-
Misc | Filed: May 01, 2024 | Entered: May 01, 2024 Miami Products & Chemical Co. v. Olin Corporation et al
Anti-Trust | New York Western
Transcript
NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings (ORAL ARGUMENT) held on 04/26/2024, before HONORABLE ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD. Court Reporter Karen J. Clark, RPR, KarenClark1013@AOL.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 5/22/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/3/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/30/2024. (KJC)
-
Minutes | Filed: April 26, 2024 | Entered: April 26, 2024 Miami Products & Chemical Co. v. Olin Corporation et al
Anti-Trust | New York Western
Oral Argument
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford: Appearances: Solomon B. Cera, Esq., Samuel Issacharoff, Esq., Marco Cercone, Esq., C. Andrew Dirksen, Esq., Elana Katcher, Esq., and Nicholas A. Vona, Esq. on behalf of direct purchaser plaintiffs; Steven E. Bizar, Esq. on behalf of defendant Occidental Chemical Corporation; James T. Southwick, Esq., William R.H. Merrill, Esq., Terrance P. Flynn, Esq., and Elizabeth B. Hadaway, Esq. on behalf of defendant Westlake Chemical Corporation; John D. Briggs, Esq. and Randall D. White, Esq. on behalf of defendant Shintech Incorporated; Tom A. Paskowitz, Esq., Peter J Mardian, Esq., and Alan M. Unger, Esq. on behalf of defendant Formosa Plastics Corporation, U.S.A. Oral Argument re Dkt. 702 , Dkt. 710 , and Dkt. 720 held on 4/26/2024. Court reserves decision. (Court Reporter Karen Clark.) (DPS)
-
Utility | Filed: April 23, 2024 | Entered: April 23, 2024 Miami Products & Chemical Co. v. Olin Corporation et al
Anti-Trust | New York Western
Remark
MANDATE of USCA. It is hereby ORDERED that the motions for leave to file a reply and for leave to file under seal are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Rule 23(f) petition is DENIED because an immediate appeal is not warranted. (CGJ)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login