Judge Myong J. Joun: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Plaintiff’s post-judgment motions are resolved as follows:
Plaintiff’s motion concerning Exhibit A, Doc. No. 31 , is GRANTED to the extent it seeks continued sealing. Exhibit A shall remain under seal pending further order. State Street does not oppose sealing while disputing Plaintiff’s characterization of the surrounding events.
Plaintiff’s motion for access to pages 25 and 26 of the Complaint, Doc. No. 34 , is GRANTED in part. The Clerk shall provide Plaintiff access to copies of those pages as maintained in the official record. This Order does not unseal those pages or authorize public dissemination.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal, Doc. No. 37, is DENIED. Plaintiff seeks leave to file a proposed disciplinary petition against defense counsel under seal based principally on counsel’s alleged representations concerning the Board’s redaction determination. The filing does not provide a sufficient basis to initiate or entertain a separate disciplinary proceeding in this closed action, and the Court declines to authorize the proposed submission. Nothing in this ruling prevents Plaintiff from raising properly supported arguments relevant to an authorized post-judgment motion.
Plaintiff’s motion to stay enforcement of the $2,500 sanction, Doc. No. 38, is DENIED. His alternative request for an installment plan is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the sanction in ten monthly installments of $250, beginning October 25, 2026, and continuing on the twenty-fifth day of each month until paid in full. The September 10 Order expressly permitted submission of an installment plan if Plaintiff could not pay the sanction in a lump sum.
Plaintiff’s motion to extend the deadline for filing a Rule 59(e) motion, Doc. No. 39 , is DENIED. Plaintiff acknowledges that Rule 6(b)(2) does not permit extension of that deadline. Nothing in this Order resolves the merits of any timely Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b)(3) motion.
(SP)