Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
vAuto
-
Filed: May 15, 2024 | Entered: May 15, 2024 In Re: Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation
890(Other Statutory Actions) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Defendant CDK asks the court to clarify its May 2, 2024 Order 1489 granting in part and denying in part CDK's motion to file a sur-reply in opposition to class certification. Specifically, CDK seeks clarification on whether the May 2 Order altered the parties' existing Daubert briefing schedule. The short answer: It did not. Plaintiffs have objected to any further extension to the briefing schedule, and the court, too, is concerned about the time available for a ruling. The motion 1490 is denied. On or before May 20, 2024, CDK must file its Daubert opposition brief on the Dealers' motion to exclude CDK's expert and its Daubert reply briefs to the Vendors' and Dealers' opposition to CDK's motions to exclude their respective expert opinions. On or before May 31, 2024, CDK has leave to file a sur-reply in opposition to the pending class certification motions. Each Plaintiffs' group (Dealers and Vendors) will have leave to file a sur-response no later than June 10, 2024. Mailed notice. (cp, ) (Entered: 05/15/2024)
-
Filed: May 14, 2024 | Entered: May 14, 2024 In Re: Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation
890(Other Statutory Actions) | Illinois Northern
Response
RESPONSE by Autoloop, Loop LLCin Opposition to MOTION by Defendant CDK Global, LLC to clarify the Court's Order
1490 (Joint Filing by Vendor Class and Dealer Class) (Ho, Derek) (Entered: 05/14/2024) -
Filed: May 13, 2024 | Entered: May 13, 2024 In Re: Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litigation
890(Other Statutory Actions) | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: CDK has moved for clarification of the court's 5/20/2024 order, in which the court granted CDK leave to file a brief sur-reply in opposition to class certification as well as a supplemental expert report, on or before 5/31/2024. As the court understands the motion, CDK contends the court should have stated specifically that the date for submission of Daubert briefs also is extended to 5/31/2024; requiring Daubert briefs to be filed earlier would "not make sense," CDK argues, in that CDK would not be permitted to "rely on and cite to the [supplemental] report" in the Daubert briefs. Without knowing the nature of CDK's challenge[s], the court is uncertain that those challenges would require reference to CDK's own supplemental expert report. Plaintiffs are invited to respond to the motion 1490 no later than Tuesday, May 14, 2024. Mailed notice. (cp, ) (Entered: 05/13/2024)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login