Case Study: Zhang V. Superior Court

Law360 (February 15, 2011, 4:33 PM EST) -- California courts have traditionally not allowed claims against insurance companies for allegedly unfair claims settlement practices, even when policyholders brought those claims pursuant to the state's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"). However, this may soon change.

In an apparent response to a recent split of authority, the California Supreme Court is considering whether, in a coverage action, an insured can maintain a claim under the UCL based on the insurer's representations and advertising that it would promptly and properly pay covered claims when it allegedly had no intention of doing so.

Insurance practitioners should pay close attention to the court's upcoming decision...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!