BigLaw Forced Arbitration Expected To Survive Amid #MeToo

By Chris Villani (April 19, 2019, 7:51 PM EDT) -- Even though social media pressure spurred on by Harvard law students has led several BigLaw firms to change course on mandatory arbitration, experts say arbitration has gotten a bad rap and so-called coercive contracts, in some form, will ultimately survive the #MeToo movement.

A group of students at Harvard Law School has persuaded several major law firms to drop mandatory arbitration provisions. (AP) The year-old Pipeline Parity Project, a group of Harvard Law School students, has convinced major firms like Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Sidley Austin LLP to drop mandatory arbitration provisions, following criticism that arbitrating sexual and other harassment claims can...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!