Benefits Of Arbitration Pacts Hotly Debated At House Hearing

Law360 (May 16, 2019, 7:26 PM EDT) -- A fault line emerged at a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing Thursday over whether arbitration agreements that limit class actions are beneficial for workers and consumers, with proponents of such pacts saying they give people a chance to pursue small-dollar claims and opponents arguing instead that they make potential claims vanish.

The hearing before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law — titled "Justice Denied: Forced Arbitration and the Erosion of Our Legal System" — centered on arbitration agreements that require employees and consumers to resolve disputes with businesses in individual arbitration rather than in court or as part...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!