6th Circ. Exclusive Bargaining Ruling Amplifies Janus Debate

Law360 (September 10, 2020, 11:29 AM EDT) -- A recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit opinion creates a challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court to declare whether it says what it means and means what it says. While this declaration is satisfyingly truculent, it's not so simple and easy. First we have to figure out just what it did say and just what it does mean.

The question has come up in the recent Sixth Circuit public sector labor law case of Thompson v. Marietta Education Association.[1] A Sixth Circuit panel acknowledged that the outcome was governed by a directly on point, 1984 Supreme Court case...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!