'Cat's Paw' Theory Applies To Coworkers, 2nd Circ. Says

By Matthew Bultman (August 30, 2016, 7:26 PM EDT) -- The Second Circuit revived a retaliation lawsuit against a New York ambulance service, ruling Monday that under the "cat's paw" theory a company can be held liable when its decision to fire an employee is influenced by a coworker's bad intent.

In a unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel reversed a New York federal judge's dismissal of Title VII retaliation claims that Andrea Vasquez had filed in 2014 against Yonkers-based Empress Ambulance Service Inc.

Vasquez alleges she was let go after she complained about a dispatcher who sent her an unsolicited, sexually explicit photo. The suit claims that the dispatcher fabricated a...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only

Court

Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only

Judge

Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!